The Jigglyroom Forums
https://tfc.panduck.com/phpBB3/

The lost survivor
https://tfc.panduck.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=400
Page 1 of 2

Author:  Hooray_Yogurt [ Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:38 pm ]
Post subject:  The lost survivor

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PktxD6GV ... ed&search=
o.O

Author:  Spazmatic [ Tue Oct 02, 2007 6:00 am ]
Post subject: 

Shiny!

Author:  TheDoc [ Tue Oct 02, 2007 7:39 am ]
Post subject: 

Wow... the moving of boxes. Now that IS impressive.

Author:  TheHornet [ Tue Oct 02, 2007 11:04 am ]
Post subject: 

yeah... i didn't get what was so great about it.

Author:  L337 K4mP3r Kr3W [ Tue Oct 02, 2007 1:03 pm ]
Post subject: 

"In fact, what we want to show is not that you can do this with an AGEIA physx card, we want to show that we implemented a physics engine in the 10 year old half-life 1 engine.
Don't confuse AGEIA's PhysX engine with AGEIA's PhysX cards. The cards only "accelerates" the calculations of the engine. The video shows the engine itself integrated in a 10 year old game engine."

Author:  effDefender [ Tue Oct 02, 2007 1:17 pm ]
Post subject: 

Meh, 10 years old... wow.
Doom was a break-through.
Quake was a break-through.
HL-1 was a break-through.

Have there been any recent ones? Maybe Halo?

Author:  TheDoc [ Tue Oct 02, 2007 1:54 pm ]
Post subject: 

effDefender wrote:
Have there been any recent ones? gh.
HL-1 was a break- Maybe Halo?


EFF... Go to your room.

Author:  effDefender [ Tue Oct 02, 2007 4:01 pm ]
Post subject: 

Whatever... the fact that I see commercials for Halo on TV means it's big. I haven't seen a revolutionary new game for the PC since HL. Did I miss it?

Author:  Hooray_Yogurt [ Tue Oct 02, 2007 4:18 pm ]
Post subject: 

effDefender wrote:
Whatever... the fact that I see commercials for Halo on TV means it's big. I haven't seen a revolutionary new game for the PC since HL. Did I miss it?

There hasn't been one. I think the idea of a physics implementation to the HL engine might be good for another 10 years of mod development :p
Or at least until that next revolutionary game.

Author:  fixxor [ Tue Oct 02, 2007 5:22 pm ]
Post subject: 

Screw physics, just slap a little bit of eye candy like bump mapping and such and lemme play some cs 1.5 <3 and dod <3

Author:  erik myers [ Tue Oct 02, 2007 5:58 pm ]
Post subject: 

screw physics AND eye candy. As long as i can see all the detail necessary to play and it doesn't hurt my eyes, spend the rest of your time on intricacy and gameplay. AND PLAYTESTING OKAY??? DON'T PUT GIANT FUCKING MAPS IN A MODERATELY PACED DEATHMATCH GAME! (ala halo fucking 3).

Author:  Skeletor [ Tue Oct 02, 2007 7:18 pm ]
Post subject: 

erik myers wrote:
screw physics AND eye candy. As long as i can see all the detail necessary to play and it doesn't hurt my eyes, spend the rest of your time on intricacy and gameplay. AND PLAYTESTING OKAY??? DON'T PUT GIANT FUCKING MAPS IN A MODERATELY PACED DEATHMATCH GAME! (ala halo fucking 3).
Here comes the Wii?

Author:  erik myers [ Tue Oct 02, 2007 8:56 pm ]
Post subject: 

wii is a gimmick.

Author:  Hooray_Yogurt [ Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:16 pm ]
Post subject: 

erik myers wrote:
wii is a gimmick.

You're a gimmick.

Author:  effDefender [ Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:27 pm ]
Post subject: 

Yeah, sometimes I just wanna fucking play! I don't give much of a care what the graphics are like so long as the game is FUN!

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC - 8 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/