The Jigglyroom Forums
https://tfc.panduck.com/phpBB3/

So.... [NSFW]
https://tfc.panduck.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=397		 Page 2 of 4
Author:  TheDoc [ Sun Sep 30, 2007 2:45 pm ]
Post subject: 
fixxor wrote:
Bigger is always not better. Anyways bella is big, she thinks that makes her better someway.


the truth comes out
Author:  Locane [ Sun Sep 30, 2007 6:52 pm ]
Post subject: 
She's hot as hell.

I would totally let her blow me.

But then again, my standards aren't really high. As long as you're not grossly overweight, I'm down.

--Locane
Author:  Zorlac [ Sun Sep 30, 2007 8:29 pm ]
Post subject: 
Shes good looking, nuff said.
Author:  effDefender [ Sun Sep 30, 2007 9:07 pm ]
Post subject: 
Locane wrote:
She's hot as hell.

I would totally let her blow me.


Yeah. I had something rather explicit to say that I think I'd best keep to myself.


But yes, bigger not always better. We had this discussion in another thread... when was that, July?
Author:  ZOE [ Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:19 pm ]
Post subject: 
hmmmm, average I guess.... But when you're stuck with about 400 guys for awhile at FT Benning, even the lunch ladies look good....
Author:  humboldt [ Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:34 pm ]
Post subject: 
fixxor wrote:
Bigger is always not better. .


"not always better", or "always not better"?
Author:  erik myers [ Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:41 pm ]
Post subject: 
not always always not better.
Author:  humboldt [ Sun Sep 30, 2007 11:27 pm ]
Post subject: 
erik myers wrote:
not always always not better.

yes, not always better is what it seemed
Author:  TheDoc [ Mon Oct 01, 2007 7:28 am ]
Post subject: 
some areas bigger are always better, however other areas it is not always better to be bigger, but it is almost certainly always not better to be bigger all around. (unless you are into that which falls back into the not always better or always better category).
Author:  effDefender [ Mon Oct 01, 2007 7:30 am ]
Post subject: 
ZOE wrote:
hmmmm, average I guess.... But when you're stuck with about 400 guys for awhile at FT Benning, even the lunch ladies look good....


Nah, she's better than average..
I live in LA and I get to see all sorts of beautiful girls.

Hard to tell from that pictures, but she's probably a 7, maybe low 8s (or a Hollywood 6 and a half, low seven). I'd probably hit on her.
Author:  Spazmatic [ Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:52 am ]
Post subject: 
:roll:
Author:  L337 K4mP3r Kr3W [ Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:05 am ]
Post subject: 
:roll:

on a side note
hey defender, you work for northrop grumman right?
Author:  TheDoc [ Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:24 am ]
Post subject: 
effDefender wrote:
ZOE wrote:
hmmmm, average I guess.... But when you're stuck with about 400 guys for awhile at FT Benning, even the lunch ladies look good....


Nah, she's better than average..
I live in LA and I get to see all sorts of beautiful girls.

Hard to tell from that pictures, but she's probably a 7, maybe low 8s (or a Hollywood 6 and a half, low seven). I'd probably hit on her.


Good ol' defender, always good for a chuckle.
Author:  effDefender [ Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:40 am ]
Post subject: 
Lol, yeah, the past few months I've had women on the mind.

L337 K4mP3r Kr3W wrote:
on a side note
hey defender, you work for northrop grumman right?


Why do you ask?
Author:  TheDoc [ Mon Oct 01, 2007 2:42 pm ]
Post subject: 
because he is planning a... TERRORIST ATTACK!
Page 2 of 4 All times are UTC - 8 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/